Those of us who contest on a regular basis know just how hard it can be at times, especially when the propagation is not so good and that much needed multiplier just does't hear you, but hears everyone around you.
Yep, it's frustrating, and it's difficult to compete when you can't have a beam and only have wires up in the air. But I can't imagine padding out my logbook with fake calls just for the thrill of "winning"......what the hell have you won?? Read on, there wasn't just one of them......there was over 50 (!!!!) of them that got caught, and more importantly, which isn't discussed, how long has this been going on??!!
Well done to CQ Magazine for making this public. I only hope that they name and shame these idiots!! Here's the article from CQ Magazine:
CQ WW Contest Committee to Review Past Entries for
Evidence of Cheating
“The CQ World Wide DX Contest Committee is making a concerted effort to crack down on cheating.
After disqualifying more than 50 logs from the 2014 contest and banning one station from competing for the next five years due to alleged “log padding” – or adding contacts that were never made – the committee said it would test new software designed to detect the practice by running it on all logs submitted in the past four years.
Any logs that show evidence of adding unverifiable QSOs will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis, according to a post on the CQWW blog by Contest Director Randy Thompson, K5ZD. See August CQ‘s “Contesting” column for an in-depth discussion of honesty and cheating in contesting.”
Hopefully this will now get the ARRL to start checking their past log entries a lot closer. Because you know if they have been cheating on CQ Contests and getting away with it, they have to be cheating on ARRL contests!!
I guess the question is will CQ give the ARRL the names and callsigns so the ARRL can check them out as well, and if found to have cheated......will the ARRL ban them as well ??
The bottom line here is that there are hams out there who worked hard, won a contest fair and square, and have been denied their moment in the spotlight. I hope the results in the affected contests are being recalculated to correct this.
No comments:
Post a Comment